GROK CHOSEN SEARCHLINKS
https://www.pacer.gov/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service, managed by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, provides electronic access to federal court records across district, bankruptcy, and appellate courts. The PACER Case Locator allows nationwide searches by case number, party name, court type, and date, with advanced search features like region and date range filters. Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and exact phrases are supported, with results updated daily. Access requires a PACER account, with no registration fee but a $0.10 per-page charge, capped at $3 per document, and fees waived for quarterly usage under $30. Users can save searches and cases, and the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system allows e-filing for registered attorneys. The PACER Service Center (pacer@psc.uscourts.gov, 800-676-6856) assists from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. CT, Monday–Friday. RECAP, a nonprofit alternative, offers free access to some PACER documents but is less comprehensive.
Search Strategy
For the public interest claim under the UK’s National Security and Investment Act, I would search “transport AND Spain AND sanctions” with court type “district” and date range 2020-2025 to identify U.S. cases involving sanctioned Eastern European transport firms operating in Spain, filtering by party names containing “logistics” or “haulage” and cross-referencing with OpenSanctions for sanctions data. The state aid claim would use “transport AND Spain AND antitrust” to find U.S. antitrust cases linked to Spanish market distortions, focusing on cases with “state aid” or “subsidy” in dockets. The tort claim would query “transport AND economic injury AND EU” to find U.S. firms affected by Spanish non-compliance with the EU Mobility Package, prioritizing cases with damages over $1 million. The negligence claim would search “transport AND beneficial ownership” to link Spain’s 5AMLD failures to oversight issues, using proximity operator “beneficial ownership” NEAR5 “transport.” I would sort by filing date (descending), limit results to 10 pages to manage costs ($1 max), and export dockets as PDFs for analysis with SEC EDGAR filings.
Execution (Hypothetical, Due to Limitations)
A researcher would register for a PACER account, log into the Case Locator, and enter “transport AND Spain AND sanctions” with district court and 2020-2025 filters, selecting party names with “logistics” or “haulage.” They would review dockets for sanctions mentions, cross-checking with OpenSanctions. A second query, “transport AND Spain AND antitrust,” would target antitrust dockets, filtering for “state aid.” For tort, “transport AND economic injury AND EU” would be searched, focusing on high-damage cases. For negligence, “beneficial ownership” NEAR5 “transport” would be used. Results would be saved using the Saved Cases feature and cross-referenced with Companies House. As an AI, I cannot access PACER, requiring a researcher to execute these queries.[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account/pacer-case-search-only)[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/)[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/find-case/search-national-index)
Potential Findings
Dockets could reveal U.S. cases against sanctioned Eastern European firms in Spain, providing legal evidence (case filings) for public interest claims. Antitrust cases might document Spanish subsidies, supporting state aid claims with legal evidence. Economic injury cases could quantify U.S. firms’ losses (e.g., $10 million), aiding tort claims with documentary evidence. Beneficial ownership cases could link transparency failures to negligence, offering documentary evidence.
Relevance to Case
PACER’s U.S. court data supports public interest claims by identifying sanctioned entities, state aid claims with antitrust evidence, tort claims with economic impacts, and negligence claims with transparency issues, enhancing mediation leverage despite limited direct EU applicability.
https://www.usaspending.gov/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
USAspending.gov, managed by the U.S. Treasury, tracks federal spending, including contracts and grants, with data from over 100 agencies. The advanced search supports filters by keyword, agency (e.g., Department of Transportation), recipient, award type (e.g., contracts), NAICS code (e.g., 484 for truck transportation), and fiscal year, with Boolean operators and exact phrases. Data includes recipient details, contract values, and performance locations, updated monthly, ideal for analyzing transport sector contracts.
Search Strategy
For the tort claim, I would search “truck transportation AND EU AND economic impact” with NAICS code 484, agency “Department of Transportation,” and fiscal years 2020-2025 to identify U.S. transport contracts affected by Spanish non-compliance, filtering for awards over $500,000 and recipients with “logistics” in their name. The state aid claim would use “truck transportation AND Spain” to find contracts awarded to Eastern European firms, focusing on awards in Spain or EU. The public interest claim would query “truck transportation AND sanctions” to identify recipients linked to sanctioned entities, cross-referencing with OpenSanctions. The negligence claim would search “truck transportation AND beneficial ownership” to link transparency failures to contract awards. I would sort by award amount (descending), export CSVs, and cross-reference with OpenCorporates for ownership data.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would access the advanced search, entering “truck transportation AND EU AND economic impact” with NAICS 484, DOT agency, and 2020-2025 filters. They would review awards for EU-related losses. A second query, “truck transportation AND Spain,” would target Eastern European recipients. For public interest, “truck transportation AND sanctions” would be searched, with results checked via OpenSanctions. For negligence, “truck transportation AND beneficial ownership” would be used. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Contract data could show U.S. firms losing $5 million in EU contracts, supporting tort claims with statistical evidence. Awards to Eastern European firms could indicate market distortions, aiding state aid claims with documentary evidence. Sanctioned recipients would bolster public interest claims, while opaque ownership would support negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
USAspending’s contract data quantifies U.S. firms’ losses for tort claims, supports state aid claims with evidence of distortions, and aids public interest and negligence claims with sanctions and transparency data.
https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The WIPO Global Brand Database provides trademark data from 60 national and international collections, including the EU and Spain. The advanced search supports filters by keyword, applicant, brand owner, country (e.g., ES for Spain), and status, with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and proximity operators (NEAR). It is ideal for identifying transport firms’ trademarks linked to market advantages.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transport AND Spain NEAR5 brand” with country ES and Eastern European applicants (e.g., PL, RO) from 2020-2025 to identify trademarks by non-compliant firms gaining market share. The negligence claim would use “transport AND monitoring” to find trademarks for unimplemented digital monitoring technologies, filtering for active status. The tort claim would query “transport AND UK” to identify UK firms’ trademarks impacted by losses, focusing on cancelled or lapsed statuses. I would sort by registration date (descending), export results as CSVs, and cross-reference with Espacenet for patent data.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transport AND Spain NEAR5 brand” with ES and Eastern European applicant filters. A second query, “transport AND monitoring,” would target monitoring tech. For tort, “transport AND UK” would focus on lapsed trademarks. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Trademarks by Eastern European firms could show competitive advantages, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Missing monitoring trademarks would aid negligence claims, while lapsed UK trademarks would support tort claims.
Relevance to Case
WIPO’s trademark data supports state aid claims by evidencing market advantages, negligence claims with monitoring failures, and tort claims with UK firm losses.
https://www.openownership.org/en/register/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Open Ownership Register aggregates global beneficial ownership data, supporting searches by company, person, and jurisdiction (e.g., Spain, UK), with filters for ownership percentage and data source (e.g., national registers). Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for linking Spain’s 5AMLD failures to transport firms.
Search Strategy
For the negligence claim, I would search “transport AND Spain AND beneficial ownership” with jurisdiction ES and ownership over 25% from 2020-2025 to identify opaque transport firms linked to 5AMLD non-compliance. The public interest claim would use “transport AND Eastern Europe AND sanctions” to find sanctioned owners, filtering for jurisdictions PL and RO. The state aid claim would query “transport AND Spain” to identify firms benefiting from regulatory inaction. I would sort by ownership percentage (descending), export JSON data, and cross-reference with OpenSanctions.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transport AND Spain AND beneficial ownership” with ES and 25%+ ownership filters. A second query, “transport AND Eastern Europe AND sanctions,” would target PL and RO. For state aid, “transport AND Spain” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Opaque ownership data could confirm Spain’s 5AMLD failures, supporting negligence claims with documentary evidence. Sanctioned owners would bolster public interest claims, while market-active firms would aid state aid claims.
Relevance to Case
Open Ownership’s data supports negligence claims with transparency evidence, public interest claims with sanctions data, and state aid claims with market distortion evidence.
https://www.infocif.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
Infocif.es provides Spanish company data, including financials, directors, and ownership, with searches by company name, CIF, sector (e.g., transport), and province. It supports basic Boolean operators and exact phrases, ideal for identifying non-compliant Spanish transport firms.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with sector “transport” and dates 2020-2025 to identify non-compliant firms gaining market share, filtering for firms with CIFs linked to Poland or Romania. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to find opaque ownership, focusing on firms with incomplete director data. The tort claim would query “transporte AND UK” to identify UK firms’ losses in Spain. I would sort by revenue (descending), export data, and cross-reference with Registradores de España.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target ownership issues. For tort, “transporte AND UK” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Eastern European firms’ financials could show market gains, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Opaque ownership would aid negligence claims, while UK firm losses would support tort claims.
Relevance to Case
Infocif’s data supports state aid claims with market distortion evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and tort claims with UK losses.
https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Spanish Ministry of Finance’s Conflicts of Interest Office page lists financial disclosures of senior public officials, searchable by name, position, and date, with basic keyword search but no explicit Boolean operators. It is ideal for identifying conflicts in transport policy enforcement.
Search Strategy
For the public interest claim, I would search “transporte AND sanciones” to find officials with ties to sanctioned transport firms, filtering by 2020-2025. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link officials to 5AMLD non-compliance. The state aid claim would query “transporte AND competencia” to identify conflicts enabling market distortions. I would sort by position (senior officials in transport) and cross-reference with LobbyFacts.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND sanciones” with 2020-2025 filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target transparency issues. For state aid, “transporte AND competencia” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Disclosures could reveal officials’ ties to sanctioned firms, supporting public interest claims with documentary evidence. Transparency conflicts would aid negligence claims, while competition conflicts would support state aid claims.
Relevance to Case
Disclosures support public interest claims with sanctions evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and state aid claims with conflict data.
https://www.congresodiputados.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Spanish Congress of Deputies website provides parliamentary data, including debates and disclosures, with searches by keyword, deputy, committee (e.g., transport), and date. Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for tracking transport policy discussions.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport committee and 2020-2025 filters to find debates on market distortions. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link 5AMLD failures to policy inaction. The public interest claim would query “transporte AND sanciones” to identify sanctioned firm discussions. I would sort by date (descending) and cross-reference with LobbyFacts.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport committee filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target transparency. For public interest, “transporte AND sanciones” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Debates could show inaction on subsidies, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Transparency discussions would aid negligence claims, while sanctions mentions would bolster public interest claims.
Relevance to Case
Congress data supports state aid claims with policy evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and public interest claims with sanctions discussions.
https://www.cnmv.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The CNMV (Spain’s securities regulator) provides data on listed companies, with searches by company name, ISIN, and sector, supporting basic Boolean operators. It includes financial reports and sanctions, ideal for transport firm financials.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with sector “transport” and 2020-2025 to identify listed firms gaining from non-compliance. The tort claim would use “transporte AND UK” to find UK firms’ losses. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” for opaque ownership. I would sort by market cap (over €10 million) and cross-reference with Infocif.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND UK,” would target losses. For negligence, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Financial reports could show Eastern European firms’ gains, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. UK firm losses would aid tort claims, while opaque ownership would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
CNMV data supports state aid claims with market evidence, tort claims with loss data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.
https://www.cnmc.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The CNMC (Spain’s competition authority) provides antitrust and regulatory data, with searches by case number, company, and sector (e.g., transport). Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for state aid and regulatory failure evidence.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with sector “transport” and 2020-2025 to find cases on market distortions. The tort claim would use “transporte AND daños” to identify haulier damages. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND transparencia” to link 5AMLD failures. I would sort by case status (ongoing) and cross-reference with EUR-Lex.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND daños,” would target damages. For negligence, “transporte AND transparencia” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Antitrust cases could show Spanish subsidies, supporting state aid claims with legal evidence. Damage cases would aid tort claims, while transparency failures would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
CNMC data supports state aid claims with antitrust evidence, tort claims with damage data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.
https://transparencia.gencat.cat/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Catalonia Transparency Portal provides regional public data, including contracts and official disclosures, with searches by keyword, department, and date. Boolean operators are supported, ideal for regional transport policy insights.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport department and 2020-2025 filters to find regional subsidies. The tort claim would use “transporte AND UK” to identify UK haulier impacts in Catalonia. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link transparency failures. I would sort by contract value (over €100,000) and cross-reference with Infocif.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport department filters. A second query, “transporte AND UK,” would target UK impacts. For negligence, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Regional subsidies could support state aid claims with documentary evidence. UK haulier impacts would aid tort claims, while transparency failures would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
Catalonia’s data supports state aid claims with regional evidence, tort claims with impact data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.
https://www.pacer.gov/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) service, managed by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, provides electronic access to federal court records across district, bankruptcy, and appellate courts. The PACER Case Locator allows nationwide searches by case number, party name, court type, and date, with advanced search features like region and date range filters. Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and exact phrases are supported, with results updated daily. Access requires a PACER account, with no registration fee but a $0.10 per-page charge, capped at $3 per document, and fees waived for quarterly usage under $30. Users can save searches and cases, and the Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system allows e-filing for registered attorneys. The PACER Service Center (pacer@psc.uscourts.gov, 800-676-6856) assists from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. CT, Monday–Friday. RECAP, a nonprofit alternative, offers free access to some PACER documents but is less comprehensive.
Search Strategy
For the public interest claim under the UK’s National Security and Investment Act, I would search “transport AND Spain AND sanctions” with court type “district” and date range 2020-2025 to identify U.S. cases involving sanctioned Eastern European transport firms operating in Spain, filtering by party names containing “logistics” or “haulage” and cross-referencing with OpenSanctions for sanctions data. The state aid claim would use “transport AND Spain AND antitrust” to find U.S. antitrust cases linked to Spanish market distortions, focusing on cases with “state aid” or “subsidy” in dockets. The tort claim would query “transport AND economic injury AND EU” to find U.S. firms affected by Spanish non-compliance with the EU Mobility Package, prioritizing cases with damages over $1 million. The negligence claim would search “transport AND beneficial ownership” to link Spain’s 5AMLD failures to oversight issues, using proximity operator “beneficial ownership” NEAR5 “transport.” I would sort by filing date (descending), limit results to 10 pages to manage costs ($1 max), and export dockets as PDFs for analysis with SEC EDGAR filings.
Execution (Hypothetical, Due to Limitations)
A researcher would register for a PACER account, log into the Case Locator, and enter “transport AND Spain AND sanctions” with district court and 2020-2025 filters, selecting party names with “logistics” or “haulage.” They would review dockets for sanctions mentions, cross-checking with OpenSanctions. A second query, “transport AND Spain AND antitrust,” would target antitrust dockets, filtering for “state aid.” For tort, “transport AND economic injury AND EU” would be searched, focusing on high-damage cases. For negligence, “beneficial ownership” NEAR5 “transport” would be used. Results would be saved using the Saved Cases feature and cross-referenced with Companies House. As an AI, I cannot access PACER, requiring a researcher to execute these queries.[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account/pacer-case-search-only)[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/)[](https://pacer.uscourts.gov/find-case/search-national-index)
Potential Findings
Dockets could reveal U.S. cases against sanctioned Eastern European firms in Spain, providing legal evidence (case filings) for public interest claims. Antitrust cases might document Spanish subsidies, supporting state aid claims with legal evidence. Economic injury cases could quantify U.S. firms’ losses (e.g., $10 million), aiding tort claims with documentary evidence. Beneficial ownership cases could link transparency failures to negligence, offering documentary evidence.
Relevance to Case
PACER’s U.S. court data supports public interest claims by identifying sanctioned entities, state aid claims with antitrust evidence, tort claims with economic impacts, and negligence claims with transparency issues, enhancing mediation leverage despite limited direct EU applicability.
https://www.usaspending.gov/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
USAspending.gov, managed by the U.S. Treasury, tracks federal spending, including contracts and grants, with data from over 100 agencies. The advanced search supports filters by keyword, agency (e.g., Department of Transportation), recipient, award type (e.g., contracts), NAICS code (e.g., 484 for truck transportation), and fiscal year, with Boolean operators and exact phrases. Data includes recipient details, contract values, and performance locations, updated monthly, ideal for analyzing transport sector contracts.
Search Strategy
For the tort claim, I would search “truck transportation AND EU AND economic impact” with NAICS code 484, agency “Department of Transportation,” and fiscal years 2020-2025 to identify U.S. transport contracts affected by Spanish non-compliance, filtering for awards over $500,000 and recipients with “logistics” in their name. The state aid claim would use “truck transportation AND Spain” to find contracts awarded to Eastern European firms, focusing on awards in Spain or EU. The public interest claim would query “truck transportation AND sanctions” to identify recipients linked to sanctioned entities, cross-referencing with OpenSanctions. The negligence claim would search “truck transportation AND beneficial ownership” to link transparency failures to contract awards. I would sort by award amount (descending), export CSVs, and cross-reference with OpenCorporates for ownership data.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would access the advanced search, entering “truck transportation AND EU AND economic impact” with NAICS 484, DOT agency, and 2020-2025 filters. They would review awards for EU-related losses. A second query, “truck transportation AND Spain,” would target Eastern European recipients. For public interest, “truck transportation AND sanctions” would be searched, with results checked via OpenSanctions. For negligence, “truck transportation AND beneficial ownership” would be used. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Contract data could show U.S. firms losing $5 million in EU contracts, supporting tort claims with statistical evidence. Awards to Eastern European firms could indicate market distortions, aiding state aid claims with documentary evidence. Sanctioned recipients would bolster public interest claims, while opaque ownership would support negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
USAspending’s contract data quantifies U.S. firms’ losses for tort claims, supports state aid claims with evidence of distortions, and aids public interest and negligence claims with sanctions and transparency data.
https://www.wipo.int/branddb/en/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The WIPO Global Brand Database provides trademark data from 60 national and international collections, including the EU and Spain. The advanced search supports filters by keyword, applicant, brand owner, country (e.g., ES for Spain), and status, with Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT) and proximity operators (NEAR). It is ideal for identifying transport firms’ trademarks linked to market advantages.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transport AND Spain NEAR5 brand” with country ES and Eastern European applicants (e.g., PL, RO) from 2020-2025 to identify trademarks by non-compliant firms gaining market share. The negligence claim would use “transport AND monitoring” to find trademarks for unimplemented digital monitoring technologies, filtering for active status. The tort claim would query “transport AND UK” to identify UK firms’ trademarks impacted by losses, focusing on cancelled or lapsed statuses. I would sort by registration date (descending), export results as CSVs, and cross-reference with Espacenet for patent data.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transport AND Spain NEAR5 brand” with ES and Eastern European applicant filters. A second query, “transport AND monitoring,” would target monitoring tech. For tort, “transport AND UK” would focus on lapsed trademarks. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Trademarks by Eastern European firms could show competitive advantages, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Missing monitoring trademarks would aid negligence claims, while lapsed UK trademarks would support tort claims.
Relevance to Case
WIPO’s trademark data supports state aid claims by evidencing market advantages, negligence claims with monitoring failures, and tort claims with UK firm losses.
https://www.openownership.org/en/register/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Open Ownership Register aggregates global beneficial ownership data, supporting searches by company, person, and jurisdiction (e.g., Spain, UK), with filters for ownership percentage and data source (e.g., national registers). Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for linking Spain’s 5AMLD failures to transport firms.
Search Strategy
For the negligence claim, I would search “transport AND Spain AND beneficial ownership” with jurisdiction ES and ownership over 25% from 2020-2025 to identify opaque transport firms linked to 5AMLD non-compliance. The public interest claim would use “transport AND Eastern Europe AND sanctions” to find sanctioned owners, filtering for jurisdictions PL and RO. The state aid claim would query “transport AND Spain” to identify firms benefiting from regulatory inaction. I would sort by ownership percentage (descending), export JSON data, and cross-reference with OpenSanctions.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transport AND Spain AND beneficial ownership” with ES and 25%+ ownership filters. A second query, “transport AND Eastern Europe AND sanctions,” would target PL and RO. For state aid, “transport AND Spain” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Opaque ownership data could confirm Spain’s 5AMLD failures, supporting negligence claims with documentary evidence. Sanctioned owners would bolster public interest claims, while market-active firms would aid state aid claims.
Relevance to Case
Open Ownership’s data supports negligence claims with transparency evidence, public interest claims with sanctions data, and state aid claims with market distortion evidence.
https://www.infocif.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
Infocif.es provides Spanish company data, including financials, directors, and ownership, with searches by company name, CIF, sector (e.g., transport), and province. It supports basic Boolean operators and exact phrases, ideal for identifying non-compliant Spanish transport firms.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with sector “transport” and dates 2020-2025 to identify non-compliant firms gaining market share, filtering for firms with CIFs linked to Poland or Romania. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to find opaque ownership, focusing on firms with incomplete director data. The tort claim would query “transporte AND UK” to identify UK firms’ losses in Spain. I would sort by revenue (descending), export data, and cross-reference with Registradores de España.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target ownership issues. For tort, “transporte AND UK” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Eastern European firms’ financials could show market gains, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Opaque ownership would aid negligence claims, while UK firm losses would support tort claims.
Relevance to Case
Infocif’s data supports state aid claims with market distortion evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and tort claims with UK losses.
https://www.hacienda.gob.es/es-ES/SecretariaDeEstadoDeFuncionPublica/OficinaConflictoIntereses/Paginas/DeclaracionesdealtoscargosdelaAGE.aspx
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Spanish Ministry of Finance’s Conflicts of Interest Office page lists financial disclosures of senior public officials, searchable by name, position, and date, with basic keyword search but no explicit Boolean operators. It is ideal for identifying conflicts in transport policy enforcement.
Search Strategy
For the public interest claim, I would search “transporte AND sanciones” to find officials with ties to sanctioned transport firms, filtering by 2020-2025. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link officials to 5AMLD non-compliance. The state aid claim would query “transporte AND competencia” to identify conflicts enabling market distortions. I would sort by position (senior officials in transport) and cross-reference with LobbyFacts.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND sanciones” with 2020-2025 filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target transparency issues. For state aid, “transporte AND competencia” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Disclosures could reveal officials’ ties to sanctioned firms, supporting public interest claims with documentary evidence. Transparency conflicts would aid negligence claims, while competition conflicts would support state aid claims.
Relevance to Case
Disclosures support public interest claims with sanctions evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and state aid claims with conflict data.
https://www.congresodiputados.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Spanish Congress of Deputies website provides parliamentary data, including debates and disclosures, with searches by keyword, deputy, committee (e.g., transport), and date. Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for tracking transport policy discussions.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport committee and 2020-2025 filters to find debates on market distortions. The negligence claim would use “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link 5AMLD failures to policy inaction. The public interest claim would query “transporte AND sanciones” to identify sanctioned firm discussions. I would sort by date (descending) and cross-reference with LobbyFacts.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport committee filters. A second query, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva,” would target transparency. For public interest, “transporte AND sanciones” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Debates could show inaction on subsidies, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. Transparency discussions would aid negligence claims, while sanctions mentions would bolster public interest claims.
Relevance to Case
Congress data supports state aid claims with policy evidence, negligence claims with transparency failures, and public interest claims with sanctions discussions.
https://www.cnmv.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The CNMV (Spain’s securities regulator) provides data on listed companies, with searches by company name, ISIN, and sector, supporting basic Boolean operators. It includes financial reports and sanctions, ideal for transport firm financials.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with sector “transport” and 2020-2025 to identify listed firms gaining from non-compliance. The tort claim would use “transporte AND UK” to find UK firms’ losses. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” for opaque ownership. I would sort by market cap (over €10 million) and cross-reference with Infocif.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND Eastern Europe” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND UK,” would target losses. For negligence, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Financial reports could show Eastern European firms’ gains, supporting state aid claims with documentary evidence. UK firm losses would aid tort claims, while opaque ownership would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
CNMV data supports state aid claims with market evidence, tort claims with loss data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.
https://www.cnmc.es/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The CNMC (Spain’s competition authority) provides antitrust and regulatory data, with searches by case number, company, and sector (e.g., transport). Boolean operators and exact phrases are supported, ideal for state aid and regulatory failure evidence.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with sector “transport” and 2020-2025 to find cases on market distortions. The tort claim would use “transporte AND daños” to identify haulier damages. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND transparencia” to link 5AMLD failures. I would sort by case status (ongoing) and cross-reference with EUR-Lex.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport sector filters. A second query, “transporte AND daños,” would target damages. For negligence, “transporte AND transparencia” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a researcher.
Potential Findings
Antitrust cases could show Spanish subsidies, supporting state aid claims with legal evidence. Damage cases would aid tort claims, while transparency failures would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
CNMC data supports state aid claims with antitrust evidence, tort claims with damage data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.
https://transparencia.gencat.cat/
Webpage Content and Advanced Search Rules
The Catalonia Transparency Portal provides regional public data, including contracts and official disclosures, with searches by keyword, department, and date. Boolean operators are supported, ideal for regional transport policy insights.
Search Strategy
For the state aid claim, I would search “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport department and 2020-2025 filters to find regional subsidies. The tort claim would use “transporte AND UK” to identify UK haulier impacts in Catalonia. The negligence claim would query “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” to link transparency failures. I would sort by contract value (over €100,000) and cross-reference with Infocif.
Execution (Hypothetical)
A researcher would enter “transporte AND ayuda estatal” with transport department filters. A second query, “transporte AND UK,” would target UK impacts. For negligence, “transporte AND titularidad efectiva” would be searched. I cannot access the site, requiring a Spanish-speaking researcher.
Potential Findings
Regional subsidies could support state aid claims with documentary evidence. UK haulier impacts would aid tort claims, while transparency failures would bolster negligence claims.
Relevance to Case
Catalonia’s data supports state aid claims with regional evidence, tort claims with impact data, and negligence claims with transparency failures.